Re: nitrous on a 4.7

From: Chris Spotts (ccs138@psu.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 20:32:50 EDT


Come on man, there's no need for that.

-Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnoldo Silva" <silva@rio.bravo.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: DML: nitrous on a 4.7

> how is that a fact did one blow up on you or anyone that you know asswipe
i
> did not ask you if my intake was plastic i know that. people like you piss
> me off. stop directing posts to me.
> arnold
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Levy" <andylevy@bigfoot.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:51 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: nitrous on a 4.7
>
>
> > How are facts "negative feedback?" If you don't want to hear that
> > something will be less dangerous on another engine than it is on yours
> > (alumninum vs. plastic shattering), then don't ask it. Think of where
> > people would be if they only got "positive" responses and no one ever
> > said "that blew up on me" - we'd have people making the same mistakes
> > over and over.
> >
> > Arnoldo Silva wrote:
> > >
> > > thanks marty for the positive feedback there are alot of people here
> that
> > > like to give negative feedback on everything that they dont like. I
> > > understand that some people dont like nitrous and I myself do not
trust
> it
> > > completely but if you dont have any comments that can help than you
> should
> > > not post a reply! if the intake on the 4.7 is plastic oh well than it
is
> > > either way i want to find a way to make my dakota better and possibly
> alot
> > > faster.
> > > arnold
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Marty Galyean" <mgalyean@acm.org>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 3:17 PM
> > > Subject: Re: DML: nitrous on a 4.7
> > >
> > > > Would relieve valves be of use here? The normal vacuum would keep
> them
> > > shut. The occasional backfire would pop them open momentarily.
> > > >
> > > > I dunno.
> > > >
> > > > Marty
> > > >
> > > > Jon Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Considering the relative strength of Al vs. plastic, the aluminum
is
> > > less
> > > > > likely to shatter. Although a backfire on a 4.7 may be more
likely
> to
> > > blow
> > > > > the airhose off, it's still a high gamble to take (given that
> running
> > > n2o
> > > > > in the 1st place is a gamble)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2001.04.15 01:20 Arnoldo Silva wrote:
> > > > > > have you ever seen what can happen to a aluminum intake when its
> > > > > > subjected
> > > > > > to a nitrous backfire same thing gazillion pieces or bent into a
> > > pretzel
> > > > > > same thing both are now useless.
> > > > > > arnold
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > _______________
> > > > > Jon Smith
> > > > > Raleigh, NC
> > > > > www.fast4x4.net
> > > > > '94 CC 4x4 318
> > > > > 344rwhp/424rwtq
> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is
> laughter."
> > > > -- unknown
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > -andy
> >
> > http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > modesty, n.:
> > Being comfortable that others will discover your greatness
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:03 EDT