RE: Revolutions per mile, CABS setting? Ron Wong?

From: Chris Ryan (CSRyan@teleport.com)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 17:39:40 EDT


Original Message:

Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:43:49 -0700
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Revolutions per mile, CABS setting? Ron Wong?

I guess I could have expounded on that. 689 rpm = 689 X 31 X pi
(3.14159) =
67101.22 inches. There are 63360 inches per mile. That means you
actually
travel 3741.22 inches more than is indicated by your vehicle. That's a
5.9%
difference.

Ron

My Trig is a little rusty. Why are you multiplying by pi? I assumed 689
rpm x 31" = 21359, but that doesn't equal a mile. So if that's the
correct equation if I input my 32" tire I should get an accurate
reading. 689 x 32" x pi = 69265.78, which would be 5905.78" more per
mile I'm racking up. Is that correct?

--
Chris



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:05 EDT