Re: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002

From: Chris Lang (langerdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 27 2001 - 08:39:47 EDT


The 4.7 acutally has a lower torque rating than the 5.2 by 5 horse but the
4.7 is still a faster engine because of weight differences and the power
range. If you've actually got 200 hp out of a catback and home brew intake
I'd be very suprised as well isnt stock 175 on the 3.9? I had a good deal
of mods to my old 5.2 exhaust, TB, 14x5 K&N, MP-SBEC, Electric Fan,
Magnacores and Mobil 1. After all of that I'd still say my 4.7 is faster
than the 5.2. I think the majority of that is due to the automatic trans in
my 5.2 and the manual in my 4.7 but either way it still feel & performs
stronger and it is lighter than the older style engines. I'd be careful
about what you say about dusting a 3.7 untill you've actually seen one on
the street. I highly doubt dodge is going to produce an inferior engine to
the 3.9 for its replacement.

>From: "David D." <dodgedakotaquadcab@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002
>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:04:36 -0500
>
>The 3.7 & the 3.9 have the SAME torque ratings..
>Actually,my beefed up 3.9(200 hp & 245 # torque WOULD take a 3.7)
>
>
>>From: "Chris Lang" <langerdak@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>Subject: Re: DML: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002
>>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:45:55 -0400
>>
>>Just like stock for stock a 5.2 dusts a 4.7 David? Yeah its awful my 4.7
>>is
>>faster, has better mileage,weighs less, and doesn't ping like my old 5.2.
>>The only thing that sucks about the new engines is that the mods are
>>limited
>>but they are getting better. Stock for stock I highly doubt a 3.9 is
>>going
>>to dust a 3.7 I doubt it will beat it at all, especally when you compare
>>the
>>#'s between the two engines.
>>
>>
>>>From: "David D." <dodgedakotaquadcab@hotmail.com>
>>>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>>Subject: Re: DML: 3.7 liter engine to replace 3.9 liter in 2002
>>>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:24:00 -0500
>>>
>>>I SECOND THAT..I hope the new 3.7 flops badly...
>>>The 3.9 Works!!....why mess with a good thing
>>>
>>>
>>>I'll take on a 3.7 with my 3.9,and dust e'm
>>>
>>>
>>>David Digney
>>>00'Dakota Quad Cab 3.9 R/T
>>>42RE,3.55,K&N "Home-Brew" Intake
>>>Dynomax Super Turbo,Mobil 1 10w30,Mobil 1 Filter
>>>List Moderator: "DodgeDakotaQuadCab@egroups.com"
>>>
>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>>
>
>
>David Digney
>00'QC,SLT+,3.9 R/T,42RE,3.55,K&N "Home-Brew" Intake
>Dynomax Super Turbo,Mobil 1 10w30,Mobil 1 Filter
>List Moderator: "DodgeDakotaQuadCab@egroups.com"
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:13 EDT