Re: RE: Re: The Results are in: Gibson vs. Flowmaster

From: Mike Toupin (mjtoupin@ici.net)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 21:21:55 EST


Hoegen & Mike,

    I've got a 2001 QC with the 4.7L auto

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Stepka <genesisd@mediaone.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: The Results are in: Gibson vs. Flowmaster

> What size motor are you running?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Steven T. Ekstrand
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 7:33 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Re: The Results are in: Gibson vs. Flowmaster
>
>
>
>
> | Thanks for the overwhelming response guy's, here are the results:
> |
> | Gibson = 10
> | Flowmaster = 10
> | Dynomax = 3
> | Raven = 1
> | Gib/FM Combo = 1
> |
> | Maybe I will do it the old fashioned way.....Price!
>
> What? No Magnaflow???
>
> Seriously, I have a Gibson and love it, but if I was doing a 4.7L again
I'd
> run a single 3 inch Walker UltraFlo and just find a good muffler guy to
fab
> up the pipes. The Ultraflo is a straight thru 3 inch short welded
> muffler. It's loud, but not with three cats on a 4.7.
>
> -STE
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:13 EDT