RE: Re: Re: Got my a** whipped...WRX comments

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 13:26:04 EDT


Mark, you can go with an 11.0:1 compression and use a decompression plate
and it works.

Why? I have been asking the folks who build them from AVO Turbo in OZ land
down under. The Suzuki project car has an 11.0:1 compression and to apply
the AVO Turbo Stage-II (max due to the traction problems) will push around
250 fwhp. This will include a decompression plate, turbo kit and
intercooler.

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
System Engineer (IOW/IOS-NT)
PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
(Work) 760-725-2506 (DSN: 365)
(Work) mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
(Home) mailto:saint1958@home.com
"In fact, my work has already proven
itself to be correct. People such
as you just haven't gotten it yet.
(unknown author)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Litherland [mailto:MarkL@all914.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 10:03 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: Re: Re: Got my a** whipped...WRX comments

I don't think so. A high-revving, high-compression engine is not a
friendly engine to turbocharge. I happen to have a custom-turbo car and it
takes a low compression engine to be minimum-easy to do the job. If anyone
has turbo'ed a *real* Type R (not a standard Integra with stickers) I
guarantee they spent a small fortune.

I really want a WRX Si....

Mark Litherland
'00 SLT 4.7

At 07:08 AM 5/3/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Spending that money, I would still opt out for the new 2002 Type R than the
>WRX. Then you could add a turbo and have the additional ponies to play
>with.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:25 EDT