You are right on Josh.... I wish I could get good gas mileage with my 5.9
right now. It got 21MPG on a road trip where it wa sbabied, but I can't
resist hitting it! LOL
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
Foot on pedal, pedal on floor.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Josh Stolarz
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:13 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: 5.9 availabiliy
You made a wise choice... The 5.9 does produce alot more torque, but the 4.7
is a nice all around engine. The fuel economy is much better and that is
important right now...
No Flames... Just and honest "Opinion", we are all entitled to them....
Josh
""Karsh"" <karsh@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:000001c0dfdb$3c629760$6501a8c0@tcac.net...
> I almost got mine with the 5.9 but opted for the 4.7 instead. It only
made
> the 10 more horse so I figured what the heck. Don/t tell me I made a huge
> mistake ? Does it perform that much better?
>
> Karsh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Steven T. Ekstrand
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:03 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: 5.9 availabiliy
>
>
> You could put a factory New Venture 5-speed in for that matter. A couple
> of people have done that, although nobody I know of with a 360 Quad
cab....
>
> Ron, there's a new challenge for ya'!!!
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:31 EDT