Big difference (that may contribute to this) - '95 was OBD-I, '96+ is OBD-II
Sam South wrote on Friday 29 June 2001 09:43 pm:
> I had one on my 98 3.9 and it "felt" stronger, but when it was installed
> on my 95 5.2 it definitely felt like I lost a few ponies. I left it on
> anyway thinking maybe I was wrong about it, but after I saw with my own
> eyes the difference it made on Mark Dak(I went with him that day to the
> dyno) it's coming off and not going back on. Again I have nothing concrete
> to back this up with on my trucks other then how it "felt".
> Sam South
> 95 Dak, 5.2L,3.90 LSD,5-speed(Soon to be 360 powered)
> 14.10@98.05
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Mt5J8FaDfVCv6/
> http://people.mw.mediaone.net/sawcut64/home.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Datstein@aol.com>
> To: <Dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:29 PM
> Subject: DML: MSD
>
>
>> What gives? I'm saving my sheckles to buy an MSD 6A because of all the
> good
>> talk on the DML and now it's robbing horsepower??? There must be some
>> correlation between the other mods on the vehicle in question or maybe
> it's
>> just the emotional justification that the buyer doesn't want to admit
>> that
>> he/she wasted $150. I for one would like to hear several
>> opinions...especially with dyno results. David
>
>
-- -andy andylevy@yahoo.com http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/ '99 CC 4x4 318 auto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:56 EDT