Geoff,
To give you an idea of what's possible, I live in California with strict
emissions standards. A friend of mine built a 360 with close to 400 hp
which he put in place of the 3.9L V6. Well, he's got the thing running so
well that it smogged cleaner than the 3.9L and gets better gas mileage.
David
> [Original Message]
> From: Geoff <geoff_fahl_1@yahoo.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Date: 8/20/01 7:57:23 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Gen II Dakota Sport 318 performance
>
> I've looked into it, and there isn't much of a difference in the blocks
> besides that the 318 has an internal balancer and the 360 has an exteranal
> or is it the other way around? They usualy don't pop the hood, but I don'
> think I can get through with that big of an engine, since I still have to
> pass the same emissions standards as the 3.9L.
>
> Mark, what all did you do to your 360? I think 13.79 seems pretty damn
> fast for our trucks.
>
> Geoff
> ""Mark Kuzia"" <flyboy01@mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:002901c129e4$c80c0dc0$9b0a1e18@mw.mediaone.net...
> > Except for the big 360 cast into the side of the block. Doh! :-o
> >
> > Mark Kuzia
> > flyboy01@mediaone.net
> > http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
> > 1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
> > ~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
> > 1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
> > ~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:31 EDT