Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???

From: Shane Moseley (smoseley@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 17:27:21 EDT

Next message: Kevin: "Re: Re: Now: Playa Hating Was: Is this someone from the DML??"
Previous message: Kevin: "Re: Is this someone from the DML??"
In reply to: Walter Felix: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Maybe reply: Walter Felix: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Reply: Mark Kuzia: "Attn; Shane"
Maybe reply: Will Coughlin: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

How about another wrench? My '96 Rams (and I think all '94-01 Rams) are body
style "BR". Seems we are missing part of the puzzle.

Latr,

Shane

Walter Felix wrote:
<snip>

> Not to throw a monkey wrench into the whole Gen I vs. Gen II debate, but if
> you look at the official Dodge body designation. 87-96 Dakotas are
> technically "N" Bodies and 97+ are "BR" Bodies.

--
'96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI TB Pulleys RTcam MPComp HVoilpump DynaGearDoubleRoller
WindageTray CompTAs
'96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck"
'74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 EFI R&D vehicle
'93 Dakota LE CC 318 - newest acquisition

Next message: Kevin: "Re: Re: Now: Playa Hating Was: Is this someone from the DML??"
Previous message: Kevin: "Re: Is this someone from the DML??"
In reply to: Walter Felix: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Maybe reply: Walter Felix: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Reply: Mark Kuzia: "Attn; Shane"
Maybe reply: Will Coughlin: "Re: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:31 EDT