Hey Shane, you got a few pics of your Challenger? E-mail em' to me if ya'
got some.
Mark Kuzia
(Challenger Nut)
flyboy01@mediaone.net
http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Moseley" <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: DML: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???
> How about another wrench? My '96 Rams (and I think all '94-01 Rams) are
body
> style "BR". Seems we are missing part of the puzzle.
>
> Latr,
>
> Shane
>
>
> Walter Felix wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > Not to throw a monkey wrench into the whole Gen I vs. Gen II debate, but
if
> > you look at the official Dodge body designation. 87-96 Dakotas are
> > technically "N" Bodies and 97+ are "BR" Bodies.
>
> --
> '96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI TB Pulleys RTcam MPComp HVoilpump
DynaGearDoubleRoller
> WindageTray CompTAs
> '96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck"
> '74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 EFI R&D vehicle
> '93 Dakota LE CC 318 - newest acquisition
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:31 EDT