Hang on a bit and I'll have some posted to my website soon. I am adding new
sections for both the Challenger and the new '93 Dak. Will post the URL later.
-Shane
Mark Kuzia wrote:
> Hey Shane, you got a few pics of your Challenger? E-mail em' to me if ya'
> got some.
>
> Mark Kuzia
> (Challenger Nut)
> flyboy01@mediaone.net
> http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
> 1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 102.45 mph
> ~360ci, 5-spd, 8 3/4 rear / 3.90-SG
> 1994 Dakota 15.36 @ 91.56 mph
> ~318ci, 5-spd, 3.90 LS (bone stock, no mods)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shane Moseley" <smoseley@ix.netcom.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:27 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: gen 1 gen 11 gen 111 ???
>
> > How about another wrench? My '96 Rams (and I think all '94-01 Rams) are
> body
> > style "BR". Seems we are missing part of the puzzle.
> >
> > Latr,
> >
> > Shane
> >
> >
> > Walter Felix wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Not to throw a monkey wrench into the whole Gen I vs. Gen II debate, but
> if
> > > you look at the official Dodge body designation. 87-96 Dakotas are
> > > technically "N" Bodies and 97+ are "BR" Bodies.
-- '96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI TB Pulleys RTcam MPComp HVoilpump DynaGearDoubleRoller WindageTray CompTAs '96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck" '74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 EFI R&D vehicle '93 Dakota LE CC 318 - newest acquisition
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:32 EDT