Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters

From: kwreimer (kwreimer@email.msn.com)
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 19:39:30 EDT

Next message: kwreimer: "Re: Re: Need advice from 4.7L Dak owners! Which is the best transmission to get?"
Previous message: kwreimer: "Re: Re: raise vs lower on a 4x2"
In reply to: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Next in thread: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Reply: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Synthetic is a waste of MONEY' MEN. I seen oil tests and there really is no
difference in oil breakdown, between the two oils.
----- Original Message -----
From: <SEMIHEMI01@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters

> Sean,
> I just got the oil analysis back from Blackstone Labs with 4018 miles
on
> it and they reccommended going 5000 before changing. I'm running Mobil1
> and a K&N filter.
Bill
>
> SEMIHEMI01@AOL.COM> KB SuperCharged, 4.7L, 2001, QC,
> http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01
>

Next message: kwreimer: "Re: Re: Need advice from 4.7L Dak owners! Which is the best transmission to get?"
Previous message: kwreimer: "Re: Re: raise vs lower on a 4x2"
In reply to: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Next in thread: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Reply: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "Re: Synthetic Longevity WAS: Oil filters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:36 EDT