Thanks TJ,
I went to a local gun range with Geoffrey (R\T Killer) and his frined Shawn.
Shawn swore by the Kimber 45's, until I fired a few rounds from my 357sig in
the lane next to him. I let him pop off a clip of mine, and when done, he
turned around with a big grin on his face and said "I want one of those
f**king gins" (If I remember correctly)...
For the size, caliber, quality, safety features, concealibility, etc. The
HK could not be beat; sure it's a little more expensive but my life is worth
it.
HK's slogan: "In a world of compromise, some don't."
...neither do I... that's why I have a V-8 Dakota... :-)
Later,
Tom "Slick"
----- Original Message -----
From: "TJ Goettner" <TNJG999@email.msn.com>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
> Excellent gun choice, it was second only to the Kimber 1911 that I bought
> (.45). My third option was a HK USP .45
>
> TJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Slick North" <prodog@swbell.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
>
>
> > Actually, they now manufacture "Pre-fragmented" bullets (also known as
> > Safety ammo; Brands: RBCD, Blus Glaser, Mag Safe) that will do serious
> > damage to a human being, that won't over penetrate, and that lose
velocity
> > and energy very quickly after impacting a hard surface (such as sheet
> rock,
> > car doors, plane fuselage) reducing the chance of blowing a hole in the
> > plane at 30,000+ feet. Not fool-proof, but better than using bullets
> that
> > will go through almost anything.
> >
> > I personally carry one clip of Mag-Safes and three clips of Speer Gold
Dot
> > hollow points(GDHP) for my HK USP-C 357sig. The Mag-Safes are good for
> > when there is little between you and the perp and you don't want
> > overpenetration, but the Speer GDHP's are good for going through
> > windshields, heavy cloth, doors, the perp, etc.
> >
> > Later,
> > Tom "Slick"
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "TJ Goettner" <TNJG999@email.msn.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
> >
> >
> > > You really have to watch your target and backing when discharging a
> > firearm
> > > onboard a flying aircraft. Bullets have a tendacncy to go through
what
> > they
> > > hit, this would be bad if it ruptured the skin of the aircraft,
causing
> a
> > > decompresion. Or hitting a vital hydraulic/fuel line that might be
> > running
> > > under the floor. Although, I do very much agree with you, it could
have
> > > been at least a deterance, and might have stopped the highjacking.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "r" <charger1969rt@home.com>
> > > To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:22 PM
> > > Subject: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Federal prohibits the flight crews from being armed.....
> > > >
> > > > Federal law prohibits you , even if a concealed carry permit holder
> from
> > > > traveling with your gun unless is is in your check luggage...
> > > >
> > > > If indeed the hi-jackers had knives and box cutters for weapons make
> > > > these rules contribute to this disaster.
> > > >
> > > > Anti-Second Amendment laws and regulations helped cause this
debacle.
> > > >
> > > > Supporters of the lawmakers that vote in these liberals in should
> share
> > > the blame.
> > > >
> > > > Pretty simplistic but true
> > > >
> > > > excuse the off-post
> > > >
> > > > excuse any bad spelling
> > > >
> > > > r lipinski
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:47 EDT