Re: Subject: Re: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)

From: TJ Goettner (TNJG999@email.msn.com)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 02:02:42 EDT


Excellent gun choice, it was second only to the Kimber 1911 that I bought
(.45). My third option was a HK USP .45

TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Slick North" <prodog@swbell.net>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)

> Actually, they now manufacture "Pre-fragmented" bullets (also known as
> Safety ammo; Brands: RBCD, Blus Glaser, Mag Safe) that will do serious
> damage to a human being, that won't over penetrate, and that lose velocity
> and energy very quickly after impacting a hard surface (such as sheet
rock,
> car doors, plane fuselage) reducing the chance of blowing a hole in the
> plane at 30,000+ feet. Not fool-proof, but better than using bullets
that
> will go through almost anything.
>
> I personally carry one clip of Mag-Safes and three clips of Speer Gold Dot
> hollow points(GDHP) for my HK USP-C 357sig. The Mag-Safes are good for
> when there is little between you and the perp and you don't want
> overpenetration, but the Speer GDHP's are good for going through
> windshields, heavy cloth, doors, the perp, etc.
>
> Later,
> Tom "Slick"
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TJ Goettner" <TNJG999@email.msn.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
>
>
> > You really have to watch your target and backing when discharging a
> firearm
> > onboard a flying aircraft. Bullets have a tendacncy to go through what
> they
> > hit, this would be bad if it ruptured the skin of the aircraft, causing
a
> > decompresion. Or hitting a vital hydraulic/fuel line that might be
> running
> > under the floor. Although, I do very much agree with you, it could have
> > been at least a deterance, and might have stopped the highjacking.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "r" <charger1969rt@home.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:22 PM
> > Subject: Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gun Control - (very very long)
> >
> >
> > > Federal prohibits the flight crews from being armed.....
> > >
> > > Federal law prohibits you , even if a concealed carry permit holder
from
> > > traveling with your gun unless is is in your check luggage...
> > >
> > > If indeed the hi-jackers had knives and box cutters for weapons make
> > > these rules contribute to this disaster.
> > >
> > > Anti-Second Amendment laws and regulations helped cause this debacle.
> > >
> > > Supporters of the lawmakers that vote in these liberals in should
share
> > the blame.
> > >
> > > Pretty simplistic but true
> > >
> > > excuse the off-post
> > >
> > > excuse any bad spelling
> > >
> > > r lipinski
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:47 EDT