Re: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone

From: greg conner (dodgeboy93@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 12:57:27 EDT


It's really not a fair comparrison (Jon can back me up on this) How is a
gen3 owner gonna say his looks better when the only parts of a gen2 he has
ever seen is the tailgate and rear bumper. Just as us gen2 guys cant have a
real opinion on gen3's because the only parts we have ever seen is the front
bumper when we look into the rearview at the track...and even that view is
from a distance...
just my $.02 hahaha

Greg Conner
1993 RC Dakota Sport
3.9L 5speed
15.4 @89

>From: "Jon Smith" <jon@fast4x4.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: Re: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:32:46 -0400
>
>they (Gen III's) look like Ramlets :)
>__________________
> Jon Smith
> Raleigh, NC
>'95 CC 318 4x4 auto
> 344rwhp/424tq
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Justus Stull" <aerojust@yahoo.com>
>To: "Dak Mail List" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:33 AM
>Subject: DML: Gen II vs. Gen III, on looks alone
>
>
>Im running away for the weekend, but I think that the
>Gen II looks superior to the Gen III. What do you
>guys think.........????
>
>The Gen III looks to much like something,Idunno. I
>like trucks that look like trucks. I guess I will
>have to keep my Gen II until the wheels fall off.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
>Donate cash, emergency relief information
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:02:53 EDT