I think kwreimer was just trying to jog his own memory.
Anyways, what is it that makes a 2wd QC taller than a 2wd CC or RC. If it's
the leaf springs then you could just use the left over springs off a normal
dak (I think it would have to be a CC).
Why gosh, I just so happen to have some extra CC springs laying around. Any
one in L.A/San Diego area need them.
Jay W
4.7L Auto Sport+ C.C. 2wd Black
Mods Profile page at
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Re5X8z5la@Ix2/profile.htm
>DML: Re: Re: R/T leaf springs
>
>From: Dakota R/T QC (thegrants@snet.net)
>Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 07:57:14 EDT
>
> Previous message: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "DML: Re: After market
warranty anyone?"
> In reply to: kwreimer: "DML: Re: R/T leaf springs"
> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>
>
>
>Sorry if the topic was covered, i wouldn't have asked if i saw it. At least
>i didn't ask what spark plugs to use in my 4.7.
>""kwreimer"" <kwreimer@email.msn.com> wrote in message
>news:009501c146e0$07b67060$4972103f@pavilion...
>> I thought this topic was covered earlier, that the springs were the same,
>> the only diff was that the R/T does not have frame body bushings, thus
>> giving it the lower 1 inch stance.?? Correct me if I am wrong Men..
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dakota R/T QC" <thegrants@snet.net>
>> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:49 AM
>> Subject: DML: R/T leaf springs
>>
>>
>> > Does anyone know if the R/T leaf springs are an inch lower than a
Dakota
>> QC
>> > sport springs? Or, is the R/T lower because of hangers or something
like
>> > that?
>> >
>> > If lower, does anyone have a set they want to sell?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:00 EDT