Re: Re: R/T leaf springs

From: Dakota R/T QC (thegrants@snet.net)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 11:55:12 EDT


Jason
Thanks for reponding. I didn't mean to sound snotty or anything by my post,
i was just kidding around. I know that some subjects get beat to death so i
try not to do that myself.
I have noticed the CC and RC seem to ride lower than my QC. I was wodering
if it was the sport suspension package causing that. Another guy in my town
got a plain jane QC his seems to ride lower than mine, he didn;t get the
sport package or LSD. Who knows!
""Woodruff, Jason P"" <Jason.Woodruff@West.Boeing.com> wrote in message
news:9937FD518D6FC54887CB28EF103ED1E64AE156@xch-sw-07.ds.boeing.com...
> I think kwreimer was just trying to jog his own memory.
>
> Anyways, what is it that makes a 2wd QC taller than a 2wd CC or RC. If
it's
> the leaf springs then you could just use the left over springs off a
normal
> dak (I think it would have to be a CC).
>
> Why gosh, I just so happen to have some extra CC springs laying around.
Any
> one in L.A/San Diego area need them.
>
> Jay W
> 4.7L Auto Sport+ C.C. 2wd Black
> Mods Profile page at
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Re5X8z5la@Ix2/profile.htm
>
>
> >DML: Re: Re: R/T leaf springs
> >
> >From: Dakota R/T QC (thegrants@snet.net)
> >Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 07:57:14 EDT
> >
> > Previous message: Kevin \(MAGNUM S/T\) Hoegen: "DML: Re: After
market
> warranty anyone?"
> > In reply to: kwreimer: "DML: Re: R/T leaf springs"
> > Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> >
> >
> >
> >Sorry if the topic was covered, i wouldn't have asked if i saw it. At
least
>
> >i didn't ask what spark plugs to use in my 4.7.
> >""kwreimer"" <kwreimer@email.msn.com> wrote in message
> >news:009501c146e0$07b67060$4972103f@pavilion...
> >> I thought this topic was covered earlier, that the springs were the
same,
>
> >> the only diff was that the R/T does not have frame body bushings, thus
> >> giving it the lower 1 inch stance.?? Correct me if I am wrong Men..
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Dakota R/T QC" <thegrants@snet.net>
> >> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:49 AM
> >> Subject: DML: R/T leaf springs
> >>
> >>
> >> > Does anyone know if the R/T leaf springs are an inch lower than a
> Dakota
> >> QC
> >> > sport springs? Or, is the R/T lower because of hangers or something
> like
> >> > that?
> >> >
> >> > If lower, does anyone have a set they want to sell?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:00 EDT