Yes, I agree with Bernd's earlier statement. Prove it!
If your products are in fact superior, you shouldn't be concerned with
passing one to Bernd for Dyno testing. I think he has proven himself to be
an impartial judge of Dak products for the 2+ years I've subscribed to this
list.
If you can not, or will not supply one for testing, please refrain from
using the DML as a means of advertising. Please follow Bernd's lead. It's OK
to announce the availability of a product you make, a service you provide or
to provide support on those products when asked, but don't prattle on and on
about how "yawn", 'mine is the best and everyone else's is junk'..
As for the "aerospace companies" you supply, I see that you have pictures of
a Raytheon (formerly Beech) Starship and King Air on your website. Does this
infer you are a Raytheon Aircraft Company supplier? I happen to work for RAC
in the Technical Support Division. I would be interested in seeing a list of
P/N's you supply to us. If your company does, in fact, supply components to
us, you should be listed as one of our suppliers.
I'm sure you've contacted Raytheon's Legal Dept. for permission to use the
likeness of our aircraft in a business venture, right???
Mike G.
<in response to>
Subject: Re: DML: TB Spacer
Good...i'm not the only one confused on that statement.
Patrick, did you ever get the problem with the throttle shaft screws coming
loose? I remember other folks fixing that before they fell into the intake
manifold.
- - Bernd
> This statement doesn't make any sense.
>
> Anyway, you don't make a Billet (not Billit) TB now, so
> machine away on the stock Holly TBs. Just make sure you
> send them to people order them.
>
>
> >
> > ohhhh.... plus which my TBs over MORE , ALOT MORE machine
> > work compared to
> > the competition !
> >
> > ttyl
> > Patrick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:01 EDT