With carbs, you're right... but he was referring to the
advantages/disadvantages of the two different Mopar MPI intakes available
for our engines. Either of which would be used with a 2bbl throttle body.
Doug Myers
-------------
'99 Dakota RC/SB 5.9L/5-speed/3.92SG
K&N Gen II FIPK, Comp Cams '604 cam, Progear timing chain, MP 2-bbl MPI, MP
R/T heads, Hughes' roller rockers, MP polished aluminum valve covers, ASP
crank pulley, MP Headers, 3" Dynomax cat, 3" Flowmaster, Accel Supercoil,
Magnecor KV-85 8.5mm Race Wires, Melling HV oil pump, Centerforce Dual
Friction Clutch
""mrdancer"" <mrdancer2@home.your.underwear.com> wrote in message
news:9q710a$j5c$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> The only good thing about a 2V is that it is cheaper than a 4V.
>
> 4V will get you better low-end response, more top-end power, and better
MPG
> if you keep your foot out of it. In my experience, 4V will also get you
> better driveability.
>
> --
> Remove .your.underwear to reply
> --
> ""Chad Evans"" <hemidak@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:F335o1ybfecaQOeErK200003c3a@hotmail.com...
> > other than it fit better, is there any other benefits that 2bbl has over
> the
> > 4bbl as far as performance goes?
> >
> > hemidak@msn.com
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:16 EDT