Perhaps some people don't have speed as a top concern. If I didn't like to go
fast a 4cyl would have been fine for hauling the bikes, bodyboard and camping
gear that I buy a pick-up for.
There are lots of slug cars out there. A 4 banging dak is certainly not the
slowest.
Jay W
kwreimer wrote:
> I am not trying to be an Ass, but why even bother owning or wanting a truck
> like the Dak with a 4-cylinder motor, I just feel it is a waste of money and
> the truck must be a SLUG?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Puddlestompa@aol.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:12 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: 4cyl dakotas Was Which Dakota
>
> > In a message dated 10/12/2001 9:40:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > AWyseGuy@aol.com writes:
> >
> > << Most the people I've met & talked to with 4 cyl Gen III's all are
> > disappointed with the performance. While a Gen II 4cyl can run with V6's
> > from GM & Ford. >>
> > Aren't Gen III's considerably heavier
> >
> > Aaron
> > Vancouver, Wa
> > 98 2WD 2.5L 4cyl RC
> > http://www.hometown.aol.com/puddlestompa/mydak.html
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:16 EDT