Re: Re: RE: Now - Turbo Dakotas-Tom

From: Tom Slick North (prodog@swbell.net)
Date: Wed Oct 17 2001 - 03:25:29 EDT


these are just baseline, daily driver setups.....you can adjust for more
boost for racing....

Later,
Tom "Slick"
"Come on now..."

----- Original Message -----
From: <AWyseGuy@aol.com>
To: <aol@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Now - Turbo Dakotas-Tom

> In a message dated 10/15/2001 8:50:57 PM Central Daylight Time,
> prodog@swbell.net writes:
>
>
> > But remember these are just baseline numbers... a different combo may do
> > better...
> >
> > Problem is handling the boost...
> >
> > All calcs have been with intercoolers....allows for more boost...
>
>
> If the intercooloers are allowing for more boost.. why'd you figure them
all
> with only 6 & 8 PSI. After being as far as to the turbos max before..
> stopping at 15PSI is frustrating enough. If it's going onto an older
stock
> engine I could see stopping at 8 pounds.. but . if you actually build
it..
> and give it PLENTY of fuel.. I've found several people with 2.2's running
25&
> 26psi on daily drivers. They've determined over that compromises
reliability
> without major modifications.
> Wasn't the twin turbo 318 that Mr. Shelby playing with putting out closer
to
> 700HP.??
> Aaron W in AL
>
> 94 RC WS 2.5L 5spd
> 95 RC Sport 2.5L 5 Spd
> 86 Shelby Charger Turbo
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:18 EDT