RE: Re: stock valve sizes?

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Sun Oct 21 2001 - 17:16:46 EDT


Much better as they MP heads will easily outflow a set of stock/ported
heads. You can go up to 1.97 on the intake and still not loose any
noticeable bottom-end.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Pukeloser@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:53 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: stock valve sizes?

Dont need tolerances but I do have a question tht will require an
opinion. I have the opportunity to buy a new set of aluminum MP magnum
heads with 1.92
intake and (I think)1.65 exhaust valves. The price is right (about $900
for
both heads complete with valves, springs, locks, retainers, seals) but I
was
wondering how much of a performance increase I might expect. It doesnt
seem
like the valve size is much bigger than stock.
If I'm not going to see any significant increase in output then I'll
probably
just get my iron heads ported to 2.02 (although they say I'll lose some
more
low end).
see below for my mods

John S

95 cc 318 auto, transgo shift kit, HE stage II TB and intake, HE 1418
cam,
1.6 Roller rockers, MSD digi6+, MSD HVC coil & 8.5 wires, Hp cap +
rotor, MP
PCM, DT headers, Gibson exhaust (3" from headers back, no cat), 180
stat,
autolite 3923's, progear DR timing chain, auburn LSD, 4.10 gears,
superior
axles, K&N X-stream filter system, MP valve covers, 24# FMS injectors,
IAT
adjuster



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:20 EDT