Anthony_Gonatas@ars.aon.com wrote:
> Ops, I was just posting this to help anyone out that was thinking about
> installing an M1. It's not my site. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
> This was done on a 5.9L on a SST Ram.
>
> I haven't got myself a M1 yet :( I'm going to do heads, cam, headers an the M1
> at the same time. No need to tear down the engine more than once.
>
> Anthony
>
The site is mine and kind of dated too. Its probably at least a few years old.
I'll try to update it one day.
> http://home.netcom.com/~smoseley/mpi/MPIinstall.html
The truck is an 96 Indy 500 Pace Truck ram and not an SST (97-98 only) ram also
FWIW.
Considering the 5000lb weight - I'd say that unless you have lots of other mods or
plan to be above 3000 rpms much - then the stock intake (port matched) would be a
better fit because the horsepower/torque curve is shifted up for sure. I like it
and hope to have either 3.92 or 4.11 gears in soon to help keep me in the higher
rpm range more.
I'd like to see a dyno/track comparison of the stock/2bblMPI/4bblMPI on
stock/modded trucks.
One benefit I like about the 4bbl MPI intake is that it should be very easy to add
a std 4bbl NO2 plate. There are so many types/styles of nitrous systems that are
available in the std 4bbl plate form-factor.
Am debating on whether or not to go to MMP this evening for their last test-n-tune
of the season. It's been fun to hear of everyone getting some of that cool air and
turning good times.
Latr,
Shane
-- '96 IndyRam-HisIndy-MPI TB Pulleys RTcam MPComp HVoilpump DynaGearDoubleRoller WindageTray CompTAs '96 IndyRam-HerIndy-numbered(#142)"Track Truck" '74 Triple-Black Dodge Challenger Rallye 360 EFI R&D vehicle '93 Dakota LE CC 318 - newest acquisition
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:27 EDT