RE: Quad cab 3.9 R/T..It sure fools....

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 01:13:48 EST


Oh yeah...and throw an old Pistol Grip on the shifter for that real
Muscle Truck look! ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:13 AM
To: 'dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET'
Subject: RE: DML: Quad cab 3.9 R/T..It sure fools....

Wanna make it a real R/T (in the old Mopar Tradition):

5.9L Block, MP "R/T" Heads (1.97/1.65), Kammer Racing "Better than the
R/T Cam" grind, MP 2BBL-MPI, Flometrics 52mm TB, MP Valve Covers, MP
Cold Air Intake, MP Headers, MP PCM, MP 3" HighFlow Exhaust System,
6-Speed Manual Transmission.

That's what the R/T should have been....IMHO.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET] On Behalf Of
jon@dakota-truck.net
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:58 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Quad cab 3.9 R/T..It sure fools....

  I've gotta go with Tony on this one... I have nothing against
clones; heck, I'm building my Gran Coupe Barracuda into something of a
'cuda clone. But, a simple decal does not an R/T make. If someone
wants to take a V6 or 318 Dak, put in a 360, add the R/T suspension,
wheels, decals, etc. I have no problem with that. I wouldn't even mind
if they called it an R/T. But the second they try to pass it off as a
true R/T to a potential buyer, I'd cry foul.

                                              -Jon-



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:41 EDT