I sold it because it needed a new rear end (made a loud howl at speeds above
40Km/H), also each rear wheel moved in and out about 1/4" when jacked up,
and a new one was about $2100 CDN, or a rebuilt one for $800 CDN! Also, the
transmission shifted really hard into reverse and some gears and my dad
thought that the transmission was going bad. Also, it needed a new timing
chain because the timing was out and it could not be adjusted. And the
previous owner had tapped into the wiring harness and did not really know
what he was doing (when you lock the doors while standing on the ground, you
can feel electricity flow from the switch to my finger. Also when I bought
it had 194000KM on it (117000Mi) and it had 204000KM (123000Mi) on it.
""Donald Mallett"" <maldbnsf@charter.net> wrote in message
news:a0kkn1$hkq$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> In article <a0ja81$s6m$1@bent.twistedbits.net> ,
> befarrer@techdirectcomputers.com ("B E-Farrer") wrote:
>
> > www.angelfire.com/ab7/befarrer/
>
> Nice work on your site. I do have a question... Yea the 2001 Dak is a
great
> truck but why did you sell the 92 only 8 months after getting it? It
sounded
> like a nicly load Dakota?
>
>
>
> *---------------------------------Y2KOTA---------------------------------*
> Don Mallett
> Y2K QC 4.7L Auto SLT+
> http://Geocities.com/maldbnsf/
> http://www.dakota-truck.net/profiles/dakota/QwkvWz@DAJFf6/profile.htm
> *----"I'm the odd job man, I can't do what I want, So I do what I can"---*
> "Harry Chapin"
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:44 EDT