RE: Flowmaster opinions?

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 01:06:55 EST


You'll loose bottom end TQ with the cat removed...not enough back
pressure in the system. Stick with a high-flow cat.

Tried that myself on my '97 V6.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET] On Behalf Of Skelley99@aol.com
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:50 PM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Flowmaster opinions?

Sorry..i checked the archives and wasnt having much luck. Maybe i just
dont
know how to do it. Anyway.  I have 97 V6 with JBA headers and 3
chamber
flowmaster.  I bought a 2 chamber from ebay the other day and
before i
got it i cut off my catalytic converter ( it was completely clogged,
making
my truck run bad with little power and i couldnt even hear my flowmaster
and
it was overheating my truck as well.) Anyway, when i cut off the
converter it
made it SOOO much louder. But i like it. I was wondering if the 2
chamber
would sound like crap with JBA headers, no converter, and dual pipes
running
out the back. With the 2 chamber would i loose any depth to the
sound? 
I think it sounds great with the 3 chamber but louder is always good if
it
still has the depth..... i would appreciate any feedback, especially
with
those who have tried the 2 chamber on a V6 with headers.

TIA

Steven Kelley



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:57 EDT