RE: RE: Flowmaster opinions?

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 09:57:49 EST


JBA

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Esler, Joel SGT
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:24 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: RE: Flowmaster opinions?

i have a 3.9L V6 2000 dak sport... anyone make headers for this thing?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Skelley99@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:50 AM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Flowmaster opinions?

Sorry..i checked the archives and wasnt having much luck. Maybe i just
dont know how to do it. Anyway.  I have 97 V6 with JBA headers and
3 chamber flowmaster.  I bought a 2 chamber from ebay the other day
and before i got it i cut off my catalytic converter ( it was completely
clogged, making my truck run bad with little power and i couldnt even
hear my flowmaster and it was overheating my truck as well.) Anyway,
when i cut off the converter it made it SOOO much louder. But i like it.
I was wondering if the 2 chamber would sound like crap with JBA headers,
no converter, and dual pipes running out the back. With the 2 chamber
would i loose any depth to the sound?  I think it sounds great with
the 3 chamber but louder is always good if it still has the depth..... i
would appreciate any feedback, especially with those who have tried the
2 chamber on a V6 with headers.

TIA

Steven Kelley



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:03:57 EDT