Re: RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast

From: Gmblows@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 26 2002 - 00:34:27 EST

Next message: Corey: "Re: OH CANADA - EH!"
Previous message: Tim Althoff: "RE: Heads question"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

3.9L block, but is it still 3.9L?
I heard you were going to convert it to a 4X4,
4.030" X 4.000"

> It's still a 3.9L....modified of course. (They're more rigid than the
> 318/360 and can handle more boost due to the bolt pattern around the
> cylinders.)
>
> - Bernd

Next message: Corey: "Re: OH CANADA - EH!"
Previous message: Tim Althoff: "RE: Heads question"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Re: V6 engine block is toast"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:02 EDT