Re: Why Gen II?

From: Andy Levy (andylevy@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 18:52:32 EST

Next message: jay & dana: "Iridium Plugs : Bernd"
Previous message: Andy Levy: "Re: EMERGENCY!!!at NASCAR.COM"
In reply to: B1LLYW@aol.com: "Why Gen II?"
Next in thread: Thomas Vacchino: "Re: Why Gen II?"
Reply: Thomas Vacchino: "Re: Why Gen II?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

aaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not again!?!?!?!

Sorry. We seem to have this one every couple months. We'll never come to
consensus.

> Why is that people differentiate the 92-96 trucks as a different generation
> from the 87-91 trucks? The only different is some front end styling cues and
> engine changes? It seems like 87-96 should be one generation and 97-current
> should be "Gen II". The 92-93 Rams had different front end cues and Magnum
> motors but they don't split that out as a different generation.
>
> Bill White - http://www.moparforme.com

--
-andy
andylevy@yahoo.com
Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/
http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/
'99 CC 4x4 318 auto

Next message: jay & dana: "Iridium Plugs : Bernd"
Previous message: Andy Levy: "Re: EMERGENCY!!!at NASCAR.COM"
In reply to: B1LLYW@aol.com: "Why Gen II?"
Next in thread: Thomas Vacchino: "Re: Why Gen II?"
Reply: Thomas Vacchino: "Re: Why Gen II?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:08 EDT