Re: Why Gen II?

From: Thomas Vacchino (tommyv@thecia.net)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 20:22:22 EST


Yup......I'm staying oughta this one. I got yelled at the last time ;-)

"psychonaut"
1992 gen somethin or other.....

Andy Levy wrote:.

> aaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not again!?!?!?!
>
> Sorry. We seem to have this one every couple months. We'll never come to
> consensus.
>
> B1LLYW@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Why is that people differentiate the 92-96 trucks as a different generation
> > from the 87-91 trucks? The only different is some front end styling cues and
> > engine changes? It seems like 87-96 should be one generation and 97-current
> > should be "Gen II". The 92-93 Rams had different front end cues and Magnum
> > motors but they don't split that out as a different generation.
> >
> > Bill White - http://www.moparforme.com
>
> --
> -andy
> andylevy@yahoo.com
> Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/
> '99 CC 4x4 318 auto



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:08 EDT