Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor

From: TonyC (acellan1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sun Mar 17 2002 - 22:44:33 EST


Pfffft ;-)
TonyC

-----Original Message-----
From: Wisotzkey, Rich <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-ns.com>
To: 'dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net' <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Date: Sunday, March 17, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor

>
>I guess I'm going to have to quit replying to post from now on. Everybody
>is just too sensitive. I was just having fun on your choice of the word
>cylinders! In engine terms, that is the piston chanber; a hole. It's hard
>to notch a hole. Well, going to throw away my keyboard and crawl under a
>rock now. (This is all in fun too if you don't realize it.)
>Later,
>Rich
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TonyC [mailto:acellan1@tampabay.rr.com]
>Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:57 AM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>
>I'm just saying to make sure the valve doesn't clip the block, and that
>there is enough clearance. The valve checking thing is mandatory as well
if
>going to a larger cam.
>TonyC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wisotzkey, Rich <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-ns.com>
>To: 'dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net' <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:02 PM
>Subject: DML: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>>
>>I pretty much agree with this statement except I'd try notching the
pistons
>>if required. I think you'll find that works better. :'B
>>Rich - Ashburn, VA
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: TonyC [mailto:acellan1@tampabay.rr.com]
>>Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:00 PM
>>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>>Subject: DML: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>>
>>
>>
>>will work, but you may have to notch the cylinders for clearance.
>>TonyC
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Pukeloser@aol.com <Pukeloser@aol.com>
>>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>>Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:32 PM
>>Subject: DML: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Does anyone have any experience with putting heads with 2.02 intake
valves
>>on
>>>a 318?
>>>I am doing a stroker motor project and will want the R/T heads with 2.02
>>>intake valves fo the 408 motor but was wondering id they would work ok on
>>my
>>>318 'til the stroker is done. Some say that I'll lose low end response
but
>>>I'm hoping that the top end power will make up for it.
>>>
>>>John S
>>>
>>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:10 EDT