I guess I'm going to have to quit replying to post from now on. Everybody
is just too sensitive. I was just having fun on your choice of the word
cylinders! In engine terms, that is the piston chanber; a hole. It's hard
to notch a hole. Well, going to throw away my keyboard and crawl under a
rock now. (This is all in fun too if you don't realize it.)
Later,
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: TonyC [mailto:acellan1@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:57 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
I'm just saying to make sure the valve doesn't clip the block, and that
there is enough clearance. The valve checking thing is mandatory as well if
going to a larger cam.
TonyC
-----Original Message-----
From: Wisotzkey, Rich <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-ns.com>
To: 'dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net' <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:02 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>I pretty much agree with this statement except I'd try notching the pistons
>if required. I think you'll find that works better. :'B
>Rich - Ashburn, VA
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: TonyC [mailto:acellan1@tampabay.rr.com]
>Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:00 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: Re: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>
>will work, but you may have to notch the cylinders for clearance.
>TonyC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pukeloser@aol.com <Pukeloser@aol.com>
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Date: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:32 PM
>Subject: DML: 2.02 valves on 5.2 motor
>
>
>>
>>Does anyone have any experience with putting heads with 2.02 intake valves
>on
>>a 318?
>>I am doing a stroker motor project and will want the R/T heads with 2.02
>>intake valves fo the 408 motor but was wondering id they would work ok on
>my
>>318 'til the stroker is done. Some say that I'll lose low end response but
>>I'm hoping that the top end power will make up for it.
>>
>>John S
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:10 EDT