Re: DML:RE: Dakota cancelled - buzz watch reliable

From: Andy Levy (andylevy@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Apr 07 2002 - 17:46:48 EDT


Mechanically, the Dak needs a pretty hefty freshening. Aside from the 4.7
and its companion tranny, the drivetrain is largely unchanged in many
years. On top of that, if they want to keep competetive with the other
trucks out now or coming soon, the suspension needs at least a slight
warming over, and at some point, a big change to chassis design for
strength/stiffness (like hydroforming).

A cosmetic overhaul may help, but the underpinnings need to get work too.

taylor9565 wrote:

> GM's reason on the F-body (firebird-camaro) cancellation was due to slow
> sales and supposed
> development of a new F-body in 2-3 years.
> I can't believe Dakota sales are poor enough to be
> a reason to cancel the DAKOTA.and force Dodge
> to design another truck line.
> Why not keep the existing platform for the Dakota
> and concentrate on giving it a reskin to freshen the
> Dakota's body lines and boost appeal to the markets
> they want to target?????
>
> Ron-
> 2001 Dakota Sport R/C bright silver met
> http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/K12X33hlXkiTk

--
-andy
andylevy@yahoo.com
Maintainer, DML FAQ - http://www.dakota-truck.net/faq/
http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota/
'99 CC 4x4 318 auto



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:19 EDT