RE: Dakota project

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@MCTSSA.USMC.MIL)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 16:42:34 EDT


Another area you can raise the HP is raise the compression and adjust the
camshaft. Go with undersize crankshaft pully, camgears, and waterpump
pulley.

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4i System Engineer
C4i Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Never be content with somebody else definition
of you. Instead, define yourself by your own beliefs,
your own truths, your own understanding of who
you are. Never be content until you are happy with
 the unique person GOD has created you to be."

-----Original Message-----
From: crm [mailto:tb.crm@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:19 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Dakota project

thanks bob. i guess 220 isnt a bad number for a beginner :) and like i
said - 240 is definitely an arbitrary number. so maybe i'll lower the goal
down to 230 just so that i have something to push for...

thanks again

>
> At 12:16 PM 6/4/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >-- snip --
> >So, just to start out, let me set up a goal for RWHP - how about 240? Can
> >this be acheived by the following:
> >3" Z-tube w/ 7" Big Mouth
> >Exhaust (already have flowmaster 50, 2 1/4" dual outlet)
> >Carsound Cat
> >Fastman TB
> >Custom PCM by Mike Leach
> >IAT Adjuster
> >-- snip --
> >Is this an unreasonable goal? If so, what could I expect from those mods?
> >Anyone else here done the above mods and have any dyno results? BTW, I
have
> >a 2001 QC 4.7 auto. thanks guys, -adam
>
> From previous posts on the 2K 4.7, you're probably looking
> at around 220 +/- 3 rwhp.
>
> Bob
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:04:41 EDT