Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers

From: B1LLYW@aol.com
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 18:31:49 EDT

Next message: B1LLYW@aol.com: "WTB: Dodge Motorsports Dakota Rims"
Previous message: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Next in thread: Dennis & Becky Anderson: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: Dennis & Becky Anderson: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: Jon: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 10/10/02 6:29:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
mike@mypants.org writes:

<< 96 was the 1st year of obdII. Is it possibile that the only difference is
an different O2 locations?

I'm wondering if a 96+ JBA shorty header (pn: 1939) will work on my 92 >>

I think it's EGR vs no- EGR. I've got a set of 96 and up Gibson headers on
my '95. They mount up fine, I've just got the EGR disconnected.

Bill White

'02 Dakota QC 4x4, SLT +, 4.7, 5 spd, 3.92 LSD
'95 Dakota CC 4x4, SLT, 318, 5 spd, 3.55 LSD

Next message: B1LLYW@aol.com: "WTB: Dodge Motorsports Dakota Rims"
Previous message: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Next in thread: Dennis & Becky Anderson: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: Dennis & Becky Anderson: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Reply: Jon: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:16 EST