Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers

From: jon@dakota-truck.net
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 19:41:01 EDT

Next message: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: May have to miss Daktoberfest"
Previous message: Jim Miller WB5OXQ: "Re: Header Question (bolts)"
In reply to: B1LLYW@aol.com: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Next in thread: Jon: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

: In a message dated 10/10/02 6:29:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
: mike@mypants.org writes:

: << 96 was the 1st year of obdII. Is it possibile that the only difference is
: an different O2 locations?
:
: I'm wondering if a 96+ JBA shorty header (pn: 1939) will work on my 92 >>

: I think it's EGR vs no- EGR. I've got a set of 96 and up Gibson headers on
: my '95. They mount up fine, I've just got the EGR disconnected.

Yep, '95 was the last year for EGR, so the '96+ headers do not have
the provision for the EGR.

-Jon-

.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com -----. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | '70 Barracuda, '92 Ram 4x4, '96 Dakota, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly | `----------------------------------------- http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'

Next message: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: May have to miss Daktoberfest"
Previous message: Jim Miller WB5OXQ: "Re: Header Question (bolts)"
In reply to: B1LLYW@aol.com: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Next in thread: Jon: "Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:16 EST