Re: difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers

From: kc8lbn (kc8lbn@attbi.com)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 13:32:25 EDT

Next message: Brian Tully: "Front bumper recommendation...(Chris)"
Previous message: Brian Tully: "Re: Front bumper recommendation..."
In reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

96 was the first year they did away with the egr valve, if you delete the
egr system you can use the 96 headers..

""Mike Meyerhoff"" <mike@mypants.org> wrote in message
news:000901c270ac$79941970$ae00a8c0@mypants.org...
>
> 96 was the 1st year of obdII. Is it possibile that the only difference is
> an different O2 locations?
>
> I'm wondering if a 96+ JBA shorty header (pn: 1939) will work on my 92
>
> mm
>

Next message: Brian Tully: "Front bumper recommendation...(Chris)"
Previous message: Brian Tully: "Re: Front bumper recommendation..."
In reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "difference between 95- and 96+ jba headers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:16 EST