While MAF is easier to work with on Super/Turbocharged applications, it has
tuning issues as well. (Just not as many for the average "bolt-ons" like what
we use.)
One other item...Mass Air Systems work on a non-linear scale...MAP works on a
linear scale. If you can figure out an easy formula and method of converting
this...you're one step ahead and could (possibly) adapt.
I tested out a MAF Meter on my truck over a year ago...just to see what the
voltage readings are as compared to the MAP sensor. (Not even close)
- Bernd
>
> why doesn't chrysler just switch to the mass airflow instead of using a map?
> wouldn't the maf make everyone's lives easier?
>
> <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
> news:200211201623.gAKGNhj26027@mail2.aus1.texas.net...
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:27 EST