Wow, I didn't know it was that complex. What's the difference between a
linear/nonlinear scale in that application. I think I understand how it
works on paper, but can't apply it to real life.
<bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
news:200211201655.gAKGtWj10237@mail2.aus1.texas.net...
>
>
> While MAF is easier to work with on Super/Turbocharged applications, it
has
> tuning issues as well. (Just not as many for the average "bolt-ons" like
what
> we use.)
>
> One other item...Mass Air Systems work on a non-linear scale...MAP works
on a
> linear scale. If you can figure out an easy formula and method of
converting
> this...you're one step ahead and could (possibly) adapt.
>
> I tested out a MAF Meter on my truck over a year ago...just to see what
the
> voltage readings are as compared to the MAP sensor. (Not even close)
>
> - Bernd
>
>
> >
> > why doesn't chrysler just switch to the mass airflow instead of using a
map?
> > wouldn't the maf make everyone's lives easier?
> >
> > <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message
> > news:200211201623.gAKGNhj26027@mail2.aus1.texas.net...
> > >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:27 EST