I think so, but wasn't supposed to happen till 04. Supposivly theyre using
the ram chasis, and re-tooling the warren MI plant for the new "M80"
platform.
It will be a sad day for all of us!
Gary Hedlin
""Kyle Vanditmars"" <kylevan@telus.net> wrote in message
news:atgkan$cc5$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
>
> Well, isn't the redesigned Durango going to be bigger, like the Ram, and
the
> Dakota going to be smaller? Or are they developing another common
platform?
>
> <jon@dakota-truck.net> wrote in message
> news:atgj8p$a13$4@bent.twistedbits.net...
> >
> > "Gary Hedlin" <ghedlin@theramp.net> wrote:
> >
> > : If they don't put it it, I'll be p.o.'ed. Why would they put it in
the
> > : durrango and not the dakota? Theyre the same chassis! Although,
> theres
> > : always crate motors
> >
> >
> > Yep, I thought that was particularly stupid. (Which makes me
nervous,
> > since it means it is probably true!) ;-) Sometimes I think the auto
> > manufacturers must have whole meetings where they do nothing but try to
> > figure out what stupid, dunderheaded thing they can do next to top their
> > last debacle. ;-)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Jon-
> >
> > .---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or
> jon@jonsteiger.com ------.
> > | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot -
SEL
> |
> > | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96
FireFly
> |
> > `------------------------------------------
> http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:48:14 EST