Isn't the new ATF+4 synthetic too? That's what i'm using now.
Gary Hedlin
in article 001601c2b419$ff3d1350$0200a8c0@sys15, "Rick Barnes" at
barnesrv@attbi.com wrote on 1/4/03 11:52 AM:
>
> Royal Purple makes a Syn ATF+3
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Kenneth M.
> Berntsen
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:32 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Synthetic ATF
>
>
> I was looking to pickup some Synthetic ATF (Mobile 1) yesterday and
> noticed that I could not find any that said they met the ATF+3
> requirements. The only Mobile 1 I found met the Ford/Mercury standard.
> Has any one come across an ATF+3 standard? I'd swear I've heard a few
> of you say you're running synthetic in your transmission. Also, for now
> this is to change the fluid out in my T-Case so does it really matter if
> its ATF+3 or the other.
>
> Thanks
> Kenneth
>
> Kenneth M. Berntsen
> eMail - kenneth@berntsen.cc
>
> 2000 - Dakota Quad-Cab 4x4 5.9
> 1996 - Dakota Sport 4x2 3.9
> 1990 - Dakota 4x2 2.5
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST