ATF+4 yes is synthetic.
>
> Isn't the new ATF+4 synthetic too? That's what i'm using now.
>
> Gary Hedlin
>
>
>
> in article 001601c2b419$ff3d1350$0200a8c0@sys15, "Rick Barnes" at
> barnesrv@attbi.com wrote on 1/4/03 11:52 AM:
>
>>
>> Royal Purple makes a Syn ATF+3
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Kenneth M.
>> Berntsen
>> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:32 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>> Subject: DML: Synthetic ATF
>>
>>
>> I was looking to pickup some Synthetic ATF (Mobile 1) yesterday and
>> noticed that I could not find any that said they met the ATF+3
>> requirements. The only Mobile 1 I found met the Ford/Mercury standard.
>> Has any one come across an ATF+3 standard? I'd swear I've heard a few
>> of you say you're running synthetic in your transmission. Also, for now
>> this is to change the fluid out in my T-Case so does it really matter if
>> its ATF+3 or the other.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kenneth
>>
>> Kenneth M. Berntsen
>> eMail - kenneth@berntsen.cc
>>
>> 2000 - Dakota Quad-Cab 4x4 5.9
>> 1996 - Dakota Sport 4x2 3.9
>> 1990 - Dakota 4x2 2.5
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST