Re: RE: Re: Dodge Tomahawk - Need Positive Replies

From: jon@dakota-truck.net
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 18:49:27 EST


Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil> wrote:

: Oh yea baby...if there is enough generated e-mails feedback to DC, they will
: build a limited number.

   
   You'd have to pay me a lot of money to get me to be seen in public
on that thing. ;-) The comfort and utility of a sportbike combined
with the looks of a Sharper Image cuisinart; sounds like a winner to
me! ;-) No offense intended to anyone who might actually like this
thing, but it seems like a posermobile for folks high on disposable
income and low on brain cells and self esteem to me. :-)

   Its simply not practical anywhere except a salt flat or dry lake
bed, and you *know* that if it gets produced the cost will be
astronomical. I think they should have used the time and effort they
wasted on this thing towards actual, production worthy vehicles. As
long as I'm ranting, they also need to get off this whole "boxy"
and "suv sports car" kick they are on. Boxy and high is fine for a
truck, cars are supposed to be easy on the eyes.

(Yes, I'm cranky; I only got a few hours of sleep last night...) ;-)

-- 

-Jon-

.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST