Ok...I know now that you are seriously cranking individual.
Here, let me add some more fuel to the fire...I received a 16.4 percent pay
raise and bonus. Thank you tax payers out there for my check.
---------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
2003 Dodge Hemi 5.7 Ram Quad (15.6 sec @ 92 MPH)
2000 Dodge Dakota Hemi (Some idot hit the vehicle)
2000 Roush Ford TT-Mustang (1 of 2 beta vehicles)
1999 Chevy Astro (A.K.A. GM Junk)
1993 Geo Tracker (Amazing vehicle that keeps running)
PROJECT CAR:
1992 Suzuki Swift GT (1775lb) Intercooled Turbo - 350HP FY-03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Future Purchases:
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 with a V-10 (replace the Hemi)
2004/5 Dodge Hemi Durango (again for the wife)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Tom "Slick"
North
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:21 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Re: Dodge Tomahawk - Need Positive Replies
Jon, go get some sleep... your cranky.... he he he j/k
Later!
Tom "Slick"
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
jon@dakota-truck.net
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:49 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: Dodge Tomahawk - Need Positive Replies
Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil> wrote:
: Oh yea baby...if there is enough generated e-mails feedback to DC,
they will
: build a limited number.
You'd have to pay me a lot of money to get me to be seen in public
on that thing. ;-) The comfort and utility of a sportbike combined
with the looks of a Sharper Image cuisinart; sounds like a winner to
me! ;-) No offense intended to anyone who might actually like this
thing, but it seems like a posermobile for folks high on disposable
income and low on brain cells and self esteem to me. :-)
Its simply not practical anywhere except a salt flat or dry lake
bed, and you *know* that if it gets produced the cost will be
astronomical. I think they should have used the time and effort they
wasted on this thing towards actual, production worthy vehicles. As
long as I'm ranting, they also need to get off this whole "boxy"
and "suv sports car" kick they are on. Boxy and high is fine for a
truck, cars are supposed to be easy on the eyes.
(Yes, I'm cranky; I only got a few hours of sleep last night...) ;-)
---Jon-
.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST