RE: Re: Dodge Tomahawk - Need Positive Replies

From: Saint (saint1958@cox.net)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 23:35:55 EST

Ugh they did...wait until Chicago Auto Show...

---------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
2003 Dodge Hemi 5.7 Ram Quad (15.6 sec @ 92 MPH)
2000 Dodge Dakota Hemi (Some idot hit the vehicle)
2000 Roush Ford TT-Mustang (1 of 2 beta vehicles)
1999 Chevy Astro (A.K.A. GM Junk)
1993 Geo Tracker (Amazing vehicle that keeps running)
PROJECT CAR:
1992 Suzuki Swift GT (1775lb) Intercooled Turbo - 350HP FY-03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Future Purchases:
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 with a V-10 (replace the Hemi)
2004/5 Dodge Hemi Durango (again for the wife)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of andy levy
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:15 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dodge Tomahawk - Need Positive Replies

I'd prefer they put the time & money into making their trucks more
fuel-efficient, more powerful, and more robust.

John_Neff@Dell.com wrote:
> No they would not. This thing will never go beyond what you see right
here.
>
> John
>
>
>>Oh yea baby...if there is enough generated e-mails feedback to DC, they
>
> will build a limited number.
> 

--
-andy

http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------
modesty, n.:
    Being comfortable that others will discover your greatness
--------------------------------------------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:41 EST