Re: check engine light

From: Jon (jonsdak@midmaine.com)
Date: Tue Jan 21 2003 - 01:41:55 EST


I don't know, I get 13-17 mpg with my '96 V6/Auto, and a Gen II is heavier.
16 sounds good to me :-)

--
-Jon
jonsdak@midmaine.com
http://jonsdakota.tripod.com
1996 Dodge Dakota Sport 4X4, 3.9L V6, 42RE, 3.92:1 8.25 axle, "BackRack"
Headache Rack,  Dodge Motorsports decals, steering wheel cover, and front
license plate, diamond-plate bedrail covers, Lund VentVisors, Lund
BugShield, Jensen MP-3310 CD/MP3 Receiver, Pioneer TS-G1347's in front,
TS-A5713's in rear, Bulldog RS-82 Remote Starter

""Jon SEYMOUR"" <n9ngw@msn.com> wrote in message news:F32g1XbIv1vDfrwV0Jm00001e45@hotmail.com... > > Hi all, i've got a check engine light problem that seems as if it will not > go away, it comes up with code 420, which according to the guy at autozone > says catalyst system not at efficiency level. > I have replaced both the forward and rear O2 sensors along with the > catalytic convertor, and have cleared the code, but it comes back in a few > days. > The truck seems to run great, no chugging or coughing, it starts good, but > the only thing is that i get maybe 16 mpg with the v-6 and auto trans. > I have been thinnking about having the injectors cleaned at a garage and was > wondering what everyone thought, this thing is driving me nuts. > > > > Jon Seymour > 98 dak cc, flame red v-6 auto > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months > http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:44 EST