RE: RE: RE: RE: Way OT: Shuttle Columbia breaks up on re-ent ry

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@MCTSSA.USMC.MIL)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 15:15:38 EST


X-40, X-41 Orbital

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4I System Engineer
Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Information learn is power for the intellectual mind...".

-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel A. Couriel [mailto:BigGabe@fiufiji.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:41 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE: RE: Way OT: Shuttle Columbia breaks up on re-entry

they've already done that... there are 2 competing models that are supposed
to cost 1/10 the cost of launching it compared to the shuttles. then again,
the shuttles were supposed to cost 1/10 of what they currently cost...

so, gotta love the government, and its cost-saving initiative.

Gabe Couriel
http://frontpage.tripod.com/fijigabe0

Doing my best to cure ignorance since 1980!

---
1998 Dodge Dakota Club Cab
239ci V6 - 175hp
5 speed - AX15
8.25 Rear-end w/ 3.21 open differential

- Modifications -

Performance: Homemade Cold Air Intake, Flowmaster 40 Cat-back Exhaust, Autolite 3923 Spark Plugs, Mopar Performance 7.5mm Spark Plug Wires, Mobil 1 15W50 Synthetic Motor Oil w/ Mopar Performance Oil Filter.

Audio: Sony Mobile CDX 4180 AM/FM CD Player (40Watt x 4 Channel), Sony Xplod XS-R1610 6? 3-Way Speakers (160 Total Watts)

-----Original Message----- From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of raymond.irons@gm.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:07 PM To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: RE: Way OT: Shuttle Columbia breaks up on re-entry

<snip> Enterprise is just a non-working model. Maybe they can name the next working one that this time

The Enterprise was built for a specific purpose, approach and landing test. It flew those missions well and proved what it set out to prove, that the orbiter could fly in the atmosphere and land like an airplane, without a propulsion system. It was built solely as a test vehicle and is not equipped for space flight, however, it could be converted for operational space flights. Challenger was pressed into service in this manner as it was originally built as a test vehicle.

It was originally supposed to be named Constitution in honor of the Bicentennial of the Constitution. A write in campaign from fans of the TV show Star Trek urging the White House change the name of the first orbiter to Enterprise. It was rolled out of the Rockwell plant in Sept 1976 and flew its missions from Feb thru Nov 77.

Following the Enterprise was Columbia in 1981, Challenger in 1982, Discovery in 1983, Atlantis in 1985 and Endeavour, built as a replacement for Challenger in 1991.

Currently, the Enterprise belongs to the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC. after being flown into Dulles Airport on 18 Nov 1985.

Personally, I don't believe we are going to see another space shuttle as we know it in its current form be built. I believe that NASA and the government will fund research and development of the next generation of reusable space vehicle.

Ray Irons Dover, DE



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:49 EST