Re: 4.7 Emissions questions

From: Robert Schultz (robert_schultz@remove.yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Feb 07 2003 - 15:39:37 EST


""Woodruff, Jason P"" <jason.p.woodruff@boeing.com> wrote in message
news:9937FD518D6FC54887CB28EF103ED1E6099D26A8@xch-sw-07.sw.nos.boeing.com...
>
> In the first 4.7L Dakota year they made a 49 state version and a
California
> version. I think the only difference was extra cats on the cali system.
> Has anyone tried to smog a 49state 4.7L in California? I will be trying
> tomorrow and wonder if I'm going to run into any problems.
>
> Jay W
> 505/287 Dakota(s)
>
Jason:

I know the Canadian version (which I thought was the same as the 49 state
version) qualified as a ULEV, which was what California required. So I never
understood why there was a specific CA version.

Let us know how it goes. Some day I may want to transfer to my head office
in Costa Mesa. The Dak has to come with me.

Rob S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:49 EST