RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?

• Next message: Josh Battles: "Chicago Auto Show Meet"
• Previous message: Josh Battles: "Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Ohio Revised Code and Clear Tail Lights....."
• Maybe in reply to: RayB: "RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
• Next in thread: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I would disagree with the first assumption from Isaac (...objects in motion
want to stay in motion.). However, I do agree with the latter. LOL

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4I System Engineer
Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Information learn is power for the intellectual mind...".

-----Original Message-----
From: RayB [mailto:bpracing@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:15 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?

> -----Original Message-----
<snip>
> - good
> ol' Sir Isaac Newton's first law of physics....objects in motion want to
> stay in motion,
> objects at rest want to remain at rest.> Sean

So that's why I have trouble getting out of my recliner! ;-)

RayB
http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html

• Next message: Josh Battles: "Chicago Auto Show Meet"
• Previous message: Josh Battles: "Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Ohio Revised Code and Clear Tail Lights....."
• Maybe in reply to: RayB: "RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
• Next in thread: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:50 EST