RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?

From: RayB (bpracing@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 09:14:46 EST

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: Mopar new development on the Hemi Chip?"
Previous message: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: cam2 -Reply -Reply"
In reply to: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Next in thread: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Maybe reply: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Maybe reply: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> -----Original Message-----
<snip>
> - good
> ol' Sir Isaac Newton's first law of physics....objects in motion want to
> stay in motion,
> objects at rest want to remain at rest.> Sean

So that's why I have trouble getting out of my recliner! ;-)

RayB
http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html

Next message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: Mopar new development on the Hemi Chip?"
Previous message: kenallgood@cox.net: "Re: Re: cam2 -Reply -Reply"
In reply to: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Next in thread: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Maybe reply: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Maybe reply: Sevrence, Sean (S.J.): "RE: RE: RE: 4.7 vs 3.9 gas consumption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:50 EST